Back to index

Constitutional Court of Romania complicity and instigation to Crimes against humanity

The Constitutional Court of Romania (ro. "Curtea Constitutionala a Romaniei", ro. abbr. "CCR") generally imposed - according to article 147 paragraph 4 from the Romanian Constitution, through Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, the illogical inference that the presumption of innocence principle doesn't need to be lifted through a public legal trial before a so-called medical penal measure of security can be forcefully applied, because The Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian Government and the Romanian Ombudsman or Romanian People's Advocate lie a so-called medical penal measure of security doesn't require that a deed is proven to exist before syllogistically inferring any juridical act related to the deed, in other words doesn't require deducing from a particular factual premise logically correlated with the universal law premise that a juridical act must be legally thus morally taken such as the demonstration that a deed exists, the deed constitutes a felony, and that the accused committed it, and thus implicitly doesn't require the demonstration that the deed constituting a felony together with the demonstration the accused will or has repeated the crime legally makes it obligatory that a penal security measure must be taken to prevent crime which is the sole purpose of the penal security measures, as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti objectivized at large in section I.B.11 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, and as punctually demonstrated below in summary

The Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian Government and the Romanian Ombudsman lies

The Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian Government and the Romanian Ombudsman lies are in contradiction with both article 4 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania, and article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution, and articles 11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution who makes the international treaties Romania ratified internal right meaning article 11 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European Convention on Human Rights, all regarding

the presumption of innocence principle which states any person is innocent until proven guilty in a legal public trial, which means a court of law must legally demonstrate:

and only after the decision remains definitive meaning after a legal term has passed and the decision wasn't attacked, or the decision was sustained after an ordinary way of attack, is the accused called a convict and the presumption of innocence can be legally lifted, which is still not enough for the application of a measure of security which is based on another demonstration, that the convict is scientifically predicted to repeat the crime, which is not the case of Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti in who's 4 falsified penal dossiers the deed cannot physically exist according to the accusation, less alone constitute a premise for conviction or diagnosis, and as a result there's no evidence, no consequences, no indictment objectivizing the evidence and consequences, no diagnosis and no conviction to even start justifying that a so-called medical penal measure of security can be forcefully applied demonstrating beyond all reasonable doubt the 4 penal dossiers and exemplificatively as the others the derived penal dossier 14277/231/2015, were falsified by the Romanian "state" mafia as cover-up and pretext to perpetrate the 8 Crimes against humanity against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti and other dissidents or innocent victims of the murderous totalitarian Romanian regime. Beyond this evidence, forcefully applying a so-called medical penal measure is against the right to life, physical and psychological integrity according to article 22 from the Romanian Constitution, and according to articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution regarding that the international treaties that Romania ratified are internal right, respectively articles 2 and 3 from ECHR and articles 3 and 5 from UDHR regarding the right to life and prohibition of Torture and Bodily Harm, which is the sole result of a so-called medical penal measure, especially the "psychiatry" charlatanry which Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti proven is neither medicine or science and has never cured anyone of anything with its lies the deadly neurotoxins mercury, opiun, heroine, fluorine and chlorine are medicine in sectino I.A.II.1.2.1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier. In other words the exception of unconstitutionality raised by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti demonstrates that articles 245 and 246 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania infringe on the presumption of innocence principle, as do other similar articles invoked against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti which he also raised as unconstitutional exceptions and were illegally blocked in court from reaching the Constitutional Court of Romania, the relevance of the mention being that the Constitutional Court of Romania issues ex officio general decisions also regarding similar articles of the law meaning the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 unconstitutional and illegal logic seem generally obligatory in Romanian judicial system - in reality the only duty of the magistrates being obeying the law according to article 124 from the Romanian Constitution, law which is now contradicted by the Constitutional Court of Romania which would have no authority over judges according to the judge's legal independence, but because the Romanian so-called judges do not obey the law but the orders of the Romanian "state" mafia they are part of, orders which are covered-up with illegal decisions of the Constitutional Court of Romania, or the Supreme Court, the only possible conclusion is that the Romanian judges chose to break the law meaning are in cahoots with the members of the Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian Government, the Romanian Parliament and the so-called People's Advocate who as this article demonstrate form a part of the Romanian "state" organized crime or mafia, as punctually demonstrated below in summary

In Romania, suspects and the accused which are legally presumed innocent, are arbitrarily and forcefully chemically lobotomized, meaning without any other reason than the order of the murderous totalitarian Romanian "state" mafia

The articles 245 and 246 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania mention in their text that suspects and the accused can be forcefully chemically lobotomized, which is the only correct term for being poisoned with "psychiatric" charlatanry fluorine and chlorine based deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier where it is demonstrated or is inferred from logically correlated more than sufficient scientific research premises, according to juridical logic and the rules of a criminal investigation regarding valid evidence types, that the "psychiatric" charlatanry never cured anyone of anything in its entire existence and is neither science nor medicine, nor are its falsely called treatments with mercury, opium, heroine, fluorine and chlorine or electric shocks medicine anything else but evidently Torture, Bodily harm and Qualified murder, all of which are felonies in the Penal Code of Romania, scientifically proven fact already paralleled in many other research results not referenced because they are notorious and obvious to have reached the inference that "psychiatry" is charlatanry because all scientific experiments always reach the same conclusion, as even admitted by some of the "psychiatrist" charlatans themselves officially which is evidence in itself - a demonstration of unavoidable and wide-spread incoherence also clearly indicating the "psychiatry" charlatanry is not a consistent and established scientific discipline because reality or truth about what is can not be falsified by man. Psychologic counceling, the only potentially useful pseudoscience intertwined with the "psychiatric" charlatanry is also notoriously known not to be medicine, while ethymologically the "psychiatric" charlatanry literally means "a healing of the soul" is evidently in league with religion which at least does not claim it can heal the soul using deadly neurotoxic poisons which is preposterous as nothing can be created by destroying - a contradiction in terms even. The brain is notoriously known to not be able to heal after being destroyed, let alone the psyche or mind it supports which is the order sustained by the physical brain, which explains why the "psychiatry" charlatanry aims at the destruction of the brain - for the only possible motivation of impeding the "psychiatric" charlatanry victim of fighting back the charlatan, which follows the same motivation pattern of chemical lobotomization of nazi concentration camp or soviet gulag prisoners using fluorine as demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.4 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, fluorine being a substance with no biological function, severely neurotoxic and poisonous to all life as notoriously proven by the fact it's the active principle in rat poison as demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.8 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier. Chemical lobotomization raises a whole range of other legal problems starting by gravity with the infringement of the right to life, body and psychic integrity regardless whether it's forced or not, because of the notorious fact instigation to suicide is a crime, while the "psychiatric" charlatanry drugs are proven to induce suicidal and homicidal ideation as proven in section I.A.II.1.2.8^1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, which is also relevant to this article for demonstrating the murderous motivation of the Romanian "state" organized crime behind the falsification of the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 corroborated particularly with Romanian "state" organized crime proven beyond all reasonable doubt criminal intent of falsifying 4 fictive, self-contradicting and devoid of any evidence penal dossiers against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti as proven in Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, concocted to also act as a cover-up story and pretext to commit Crimes against humanity against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti who as short proof wasn't even falsely convicted in any of the falsified penal dossiers against him as proven in short by annex 17 of Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, representing Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti's empty judicial history which is proof in itself no penal security measure can be brought agianst Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti unless falsified, while no less than 6 were falsified by the Romanian "state" mafia as proven in Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, meaning 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015 first and second instance, 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017, which demonstrate obsessive and constant state terrorism and political repression, coupled with the repeated illegal arrests of Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti by breaking into his home illegally or from the street, and incidental Torture and Bodily Harm committed against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti with the proven repeated intent of Qualifiedly Murdering Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti to stop him from denouncing the Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity, all the more evident as the first 4 penal security measures we proven falsified in court of law because even the mafia member judges didn't want to get involved in Crimes against humanity against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti at first because Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti can defend himself in a court of law better than lawyers can proven by the fact he did, until the order for Qualified Murder was issued clearly from he leadership of the Romanian "state" mafia, as proven by the Constitutional Court of Romania Romanian Constitution, through Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017.The fact that in Romania, suspects and the accused which are legally presumed innocent, are arbitrarily and forcefully chemically lobotomized, meaning without any other reason than the order of the murderous totalitarian Romanian "state" mafia, has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti which triggered a joint Ministry of Justice and Supreme Magistrate Council order to hide the evidence from the ECRIS public evidence of dossiers, meaning penal security measures forced on innocents by the Romanian "state" mafia under various motives, mostly for illicit profit through dumping the pharmaceutical mafia poisons on the general population and illegal human experimentation under the false justification of "psychiatric" charlatanry so-called "treatment" such as the chemical lobotomization of institutionalized children. There has been an official Romanian "state" mafia "secret services" (ro. SRI) report to the Romanian "state" mafia so-called general prosecutor office or Romanian Public Ministry, that on a national scale the "psychiatrist" charlatans are faking experiments even for illicit profit from the pharmaceutical mafia, report which was covered-up by the mafia of course as proven by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti again by attaching his own case to that penal dossier and not being informed of anything as legally required, after DIICOT Romanian so-called anti organized crime and terrorism direction arranged the destruction of evidence instead of collecting it, arresting the "psychiatrist" charlatans throughout Romania and sending them all to be convicted, which is the ironical modus operandi of the Romania "state" mafia abusing the judiciary system for covering-up its own organized crime and state terrorism, just as through the criminal activity of DNA Romanian so-called anti-corruption direction the Romanian "state" mafia covers-up its corruption felonies, point at which it's notable that the criminal so-called chief prosecutor of DNA Laura Codruta Kovesi who has also covered-up the Romanian "state" mafia crimes since 2006 from the position of general prosecutor of Romania, is a candidate for the position of the European Union prosecutor although the European Union is aware of its criminal activity meaning the European Union is in cahoots with the Romanian "state" mafia, which was in fact installed by CIA and its allies from Europe through the 1989 Romanian coup d'etat. Sustaining the criminal Laura Codruta Kovesi is of course the local so-called ex-chief of CIA for the Balkans area as denounced by Romanian "state" mafia "secret services" defector Sebastian Ghita, the criminal George Soros declared persona non-grata in the Russian Federation as short proof, France and Germany who attempted to put in office the criminal Laura Codruta Kovesi by forfeit of their own candidates and the EU Parliament especially the LIBE subcommittee who has been notified repeatedly since 2015 of the complicity and instigation of Laura Codruta Kovesi to Crimes against humanity on behalf of the Romanian "state" mafia by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, a human rights defender since 2009 and political refugee since 2017 as a result of the Romanian "state" mafia attempt to indefinitely incarcerate, incidentally Torture and Bodily Harm to the intent of Qualifiedly Murdering Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti for the purpose of stopping his human rights defending activity consisting mainly of denouncing the Romanian "state" mafia Crimes against humanity, as proved in annex 21 of Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures

The purpose of the Constitutional Court deliberately infringing on the presumption of innocence, is the cover-up and pretext for committing Crimes against humanity by chemically lobotomizing orphans, members of Rroma minority, other defenseless persons, dissidents and human rights defenders, for illicit profit, state terrorism and political repression

This particular exception of unconstitutionality raised before the Constitutional Court of Romania and illegally rejected through the falsified Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 as proven below in summary punctually, regards only the fact that the suspect and accused are innocent until proven guilty through a definitive sentence in a public legal trial as described above punctually regarding the legal steps of lifting the presumption of innocence, being otherwise logically obvious nobody can be convicted for not committing any deed, which then can not constitute a felony and therefore cannot even begin to constitute grounds for presuming the accused represents a public danger to be sentenced to a penal measure of security. The only legal prerogative of demonstrating that a deed exists, constitutes a felony, that the accused committed it, and that the convict represents a public danger since only a proven felon can potentially represent a public danger as nobody else can be proven to be a criminal unless declaring everyone guilty until proven innocent which is the aberrant reverse of the presumption of innocence, and that the convict must be obligated to a measure of security because it is scientifically proven he is a public danger, belongs exclusively to the judges in Romania, according to the text of the law of articles 23 paragraph 11 and 126 of the Romanian Constitution, and articles 11 and 20 of the Romanian Constitution which makes international conventions ratified by Romania internal right leading to the applicability of article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 6 paragraph 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights as well. Evidently according to the same juridical or legal syllogism, there can not exist a "psychiatry" charlatanry diagnosis with no universal legal and scientific (because the "psychiatry" charlatanry claims to be legal medicine, while medicine claims to be science) correlated with a particular factual premises, or in other words without the subject of diagnosis doing anything immoral let alone criminal at all which can only mean such a diagnosis is logically invalid or without premises being proven falsified from the start, this being the logic that the Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian Government and the Romanian People's Advocate are trying to contradict in the falsified Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, the fact that not only inexistant deeds cannot be inferred to constitute felonies and therefore can not lead to the legal conviction of the accused, but nonexistent deeds inherently nonexistent felonies cannot lead to the inference that the illegally convicted accused represents a public danger, nor can it lead to any "psychiatric" charlatanry diagnosis which is also the judge's duty to inventory and administrate meaning evaluate its logical validity at least as the "psychiatric" charlatanry diagnosis is one of the legal conditions for emitting a so-called medical penal measure, therefore the Romanian "state" organized crime being unable to justify breaking the law because it's impossible, simply contradicted the law ironically demonstrating one of the traits of sociopathy meaning consistent and counter-productive belief of being right even when confronted with overwhelming evidence of being morally wrong by its victim, morality being the keyword which is why sociopathy is also called antisocial personality disorder, point at which it is again clear that the "psychiatry" charlatanry appears to be competing with religion when in reality being far, far worse, attacking phylosophy with incarceration and forceful deadly neurotoxic poisoning with mercury, opium, heroine, fluorine and chlorine, and even worse not just any phylosophy, but moral philosophy being notorious that "psychiatrist" charlatans of course resent having their atrocities publicly denounced or attacked through the justice system, or medical disciplinary system, or malpraxis system, reason for which they publicly declare anyone who seeks justice paranoid, in effect declaring citizenship and normal civic behaviour a so-called mental disease, when it is also publicly recognized by some of the "psychiatrist" charlatans there is no such thing as a mental disease, being a bad metaphor to cover-up the lack of justification for the false "psychiatric" charlatanry treatments, which where are not a means of direct profit for the "psychiatrist" charlatan, they are abused as state terrorism and political repression by all totalitarian states in the world who accredit the "psychiatry" charlatanry for this purpose, and for illicit profit from collaboration with the pharmaceutical mafia, as it occurs at a national scale in Romania, as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier. This is in short the full significance of the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 - the Romanian "state" organized crime defending it's pseudolegal cover-up of its many Crimes against humanity committed by chemically lobotomizing orphans, the Rroma minority and other defenseless disfavored social groups, and arresting innocent people from the street or their home and forcefully chemically lobotomizing them, as proven by, besides the now hidden evidence from ECRIS, the Romanian public evidence of judicial dossiers

* ECHR case 60113/12 of Ulise Grosu vs Romania which is about Mr Ulise Grosu arrest from the street by the Romanian "state" organized crime soldiers who tried to forcefully commit him to the local "psychiatric" charlatanry gulag for Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder through forcefull poisoning with deadly neurotoxic substances - since the "psychiatry" charlatanry is proven neither science nor medicine there are no such things as "psychiatry" charlatanry hospitals, but, at least in Romania they are buildings with bars to prevent the inmate's escape, and torturer guards who enforce the criminal orders of the torturer "psychiatrist" charlatans which have no justitication in medicine or science, as demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier

or

* ECHR case 41719/12 Ivascu vs Romania which is about Mr Ivascu or Rroma ethnicity filing a penal complaint against persons with relations within the local Romanian "state" organized crime who committed Mr Ivascu to the local "psychiatric" charlatanry prison-camp for a long time and chemically lobotomized him, according to this article. The superior legal medicine institutions "IML Cluj" and "Mina Minovici Bucuresti" illegally sustained the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsified documents claiming against the Rroma minority member named Ivascu that he is mentally alienated for exercising his legal rights, then the courthouse "Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei" in dossier 907/307/2010 declared nobody can be subjected in penal matters to the security measure of "psychiatric treatment", proving this judge made a difference between medical treatment and “psychiatric” charlatanry chemical lobotomization, until it has been established that the accused has committed a felony (and is therefore a convict) and that there is a danger of committing further felonies according to article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Contitution, which proves that the entire legal medicine hierarchy is controlled by the Romanian "state" mafia who used the "psychiatry" charlatanry as a weapon of state terrorism and political repression against the Rroma minority member named Ivascu, as it did against many others who didn't reach notoriety, but were witnessed by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti seldomly appearing on the internet because also as observed by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti by notifying all the relevant televisions and newspapers, the entire Romanian news press is controlled by the Romanian "state" mafia, situation which became an absolute reality around the illegal expropriation in pure communist fashion of Mr Hassan Awdi's network of press distribution named Rodipet, through which the Romanian "state" mafia bankrupted the free press by stopping its distribution at least, amongst using other criminal methods such as the use of the liquidator mafia arm of the Romanian "state" mafia through which it bankrupts and delapidates any independent enterprise, or as Mr Hassan Awdi simply declares: "Romania is a banana country (with no justice), where only the mafia businesses work", objectivizing this state of fact by the ICSID trial won against Romania by Mr Hassan Awdi. The correlation between Mr Ivascu's case with Raneti vs Romania at ECHR case, is the fact that both Mr Ivascu and Mr Raneti's cases have been aberrantly downplayed from the infringement of the most important right to life to the infringement of the least important to private life, and also in fact Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti checked upon the author of this article meaning Ms Mihaela Mazilu-Babel, who claims is not a doctorand from the College of Law and Social Sciences from Craiova county as she originally signed the article, which can only mean that she didn't write the article out of kindness or any other reason but at the order of the Romanian "state" organized crime using a "fight fire with fire" tactic attempting to extinguish the case by missrepresenting Mr Ivascu and downplaying his tragedy before someone else picks up his case, such as a human rights defender as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti. In fact Mr Ivascu's case has been rejected as inadmissible at ECHR while Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti has not, being otherwise identical state terrorism and political repression through the abuse of the judiciary system and the "psychiatry" charlatanry for seeking justice against members of the Romanian "state" mafia, the only difference being that the Rroma ethnic Mr Ivascu could not defend himself, while Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti defended himself beyond the capacity of any lawyer firm in the world as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti has been in contact with the major ones and being constantly rejected assistance and representation for any fee, through which Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti also proved the entire lawyer profession is afraid of going against this international organized crime responsible for the Romanian Crimes againt humanity from which it profits

It's note worthy to mention the evident fact Mr Ulise Grosu wasn't chemically lobotomized because he has family ties with the local "psychiatrist" charlatans, meaning he was brought by force at the "phychiatry" charlatanry gulag reception where he negotiated his way out despite the pressure of the Romanian "state" mafia soldiers which clearly were ordered by a local low social status mafia underboss who didn't have direct influence over the mafia associated "psychiatrist" charlatans, as observed by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti being from the same county as Mr Ulise Grosu and discovering his relative being in the local malpraxis committee which is a position of mafia honor recognition meaning consistent criminal colaborationism with the mafia, while Mr Ivascu is a member of the Rroma minority on which the Romanian "state" organized crime performs nation-wide illegal human experiments on a regular basis, just as it does on institutionalized children who it drugged on purpose with adult so-called anti-psychotic fluorine based poisons, just as it does on other persons with no defense, or put outside the protection of the law of undesirables, dissidents and human rights defenders such as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, which for the totalitarian Romanian "state" mafia it obviously means profit from collaboration with the international pharmaceutical mafia, the attainment of authority through fear or terrorism by the ruling organized crime mob, and physical elimination of its adversaries

The punctual demonstration of the falsification and illegality of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 is as follows:

According to paragraph 10 from The Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, the Romanian Government lied that article 107 from the Penal Code of Romania as translated mot-a-mot "does not contain norms who would permit the establishment of guilt of a person accused of committing a felony" which is in contradiction with the same article 107 paragraph 2 as translated mot-a-mot "Security measures are taken against the person who committed a felony foreseen by penal law, unjustified", which for clarification for the judiciary layman means that a penal security measure can only be taken against a person convicted definitively according to the presumption of innocence principle defined as relevant in Romanian penal law by article 4 from Penal Procedure Code of Romania, which extracts its juridical force from article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian Constitution, and articles 11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution who makes international treaties ratified by Romania internal right meaning article 11 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European Convention on Human Rights also regarding the presumption of innocence. Depending on the date of the Romanian Government communique's to the The Constitutional Court of Romania, according to this Wikipedia Romanian prime-minister timeline it was either the administration of Sorin Grindeanu who abused the prime-minister office between 4th January 2017 and 29th June 2017, or that of Dacian Ciolos who abused the prime-minister office between 17th November 2015 and 4th January 2017, who emmitted the lying communique quoted above, and is thus accomplice and instigator to Crimes against humanity, noting that at the time of the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 the prime-minister Sorin Grindeanu administration was aware anyway thus accomplice intrinsically instigator to Crimes against humanity for not denouncing the false communique as legally obligated according to articles 61 and 291 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, just like prime-minister Dacian Ciolos's administration, given that the exception of unconstitutionality was raised in the penal derived dossier number 14427/3/2015 in 1st instance prior to it's rejection as inadmissible in favor of Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti in February 2016 which constitutes short proof that the falsified proposal for penal security measures against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti is classic state terrorism and political repression, representing the 5th Crimes against humanity attempt as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^5 from Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, and given the prime-minister and his administration was inculpated by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti for the refusal to take disciplinary action against the so-called minister of justice reponsible for the so-called prosecutors who falsified 4 penal dossiers against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti and minister of interior affairs responsible for the acts of state terrorism and political repression perpetrated by the Romanian "state" mafia soldiers from the police and gendarmerie through repeated illegal home breaking and illegal arrests, ministers also inculpated for complicity and instrinsic instigation to Crimes against humanity, perpetrated nation-wide as also demonstrated by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti in Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier

According to paragraph 12 from the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, the People's Advocate Victor Ciorbea lied as objectively translated by google translate that "the criticism of the author of the exception that one of the premises of the obligation to medical treatment is the existence of a conviction, has no legal support", contradicting himself in the same way as the Romanian Government did as demonstrated in the previous paragraph. The logical proofs in the Penal Procedure Code of Romania alone are more than the ones exposed above, such as for instance article 331 which states that the penal court of law can only be proposed with the obligation to a so-called medical penal medical security measure by the prosecutor through an indictment, which is the document that inventories, administrates and objectivizes all the evidence for and against the accused, and thus demonstrates the accused possible guilt and innocence simultaneously, document which preceeds obligatory condemnation or acquittal of the accused according to article 329 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania by the judge not the prosecutor evidently according to article 126 from the Romanian Constitution, condemnation which is logically and legally mandatory prior to the court emitting any measures of security, according to the aforementioned legally corroborated logical demonstration from the first paragraphs of this section, and according to the demonstration from this and the prior paragraphs based on article 107 paragraph 2 from the Penal Code of Romania, article that extracts its juridical force from the Romanian Constitution namely article 23 paragraph 11, and the international conventions ratified by Romania such as to uphold the European Convention on Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution, in the context of the presumption of innocence meaning according to article 11 from the UDHR and article 6 paragraph 2 from the ECHR

According to paragraph 4 from the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, Augustin Lazar the so-called General Prosecutor of Romania since 28 April 2016 lied as objectively translated by google translate that "the criticized texts do not affect ... the presumption of innocence" just as the Romanian Government and the People's Advocate lied, which is in contradiction with article 107 paragraph 2 and 109 from the Penal Code of Romania who refer clearly to convicts not the accused or the suspects who are innocent until proven guilty as demonstrated in the two paragraphs above, according to article 4 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania which extracts its juridical force from articles 11, 23 paragraph 11 and 20 of the Romanian Constitution and article 11 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European Convention on Human Rights and many such other articles aforementioned according to which an accused is a suspect against which there is strong evidence to have committed a crime which doesn't mean a crime exists and someone committed it until the end of a legal public trial where the accused is either condemned or acquitted after being legally demonstrated guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, or otherwise being proven innocent (until proven guilty) - mention especially made because the Romanian "state" organized crime is notorious of also falsifying decisions of conviction such as for example the one against journalist Dan Diaconescu for extortion where the person extorted was filmed admitting he wasn't extorted and doesn't even know Dan Diaconescu as short proof, the reason the Romanian "state" mafia falsified the dossier against Dan Diaconescu being that he was denouncing the mafia's criminal activity reason for which Dan Diaconescu was put under interdiction to profess journalism of course. It is logically obvious innocents are not a public danger which is why so-called medical penal measures of security or of any other kind can not be taken against the innocents, being thus proven beyond all reasonable doubt that Augustin Lazar the so-called General Prosecutor of Romania lied, dismissing the hypothesis that even though the Public Ministry was represented by the so-called prosecutor Marinela Minca at the Constitutional Court of Romania because she hierarchically answers directly to Augustin Lazar who is aware of the public Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, and who is all the more aware since he personally illegally dismissed Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti's request that the 4 falsified penal dossiers against him be moved to another jurisdiction than the one where they were falsified based on stringent proof of partiality - e.g. law breaking which purely demonstrates partiality, while Augustin Lazar being at the same time inculpated in a penal dossier for complicity and intrinsic instigation to the falsification of those falsified penal dossiers which made Augustin Lazar and the entire Romanian Public Ministry incompatible to address Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti with any juridical acts, according to article 11 from the Romanian Ordnance no 27 from 2002, corroborated demonstratively with the very fact Augustin Lazar the General Prosecutor of Romania can not have a personal motive to break the law against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti or in general, being illogical that Augustin Lazar seeks to get convicted and go to jail for the felony of Abuse of function according to article 297 from the Penal Code of Romania, and being perfectly logical inherently that Augustin Lazar lied through his subordinate who although isn't even linked with Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti in any way, lied and instigated the falsification of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 in the interest of the organized crime group Marinela Minca and Augustin Lazar are part of, organized crime which is comprised as proven by this article of the Romanian Government, inclusively by the minister of justice who is the General Prosecutor's of Romania superior according to article 132 from the Romanian Constitution, the members of the Constitutional Court of Romania, the Romanian People's Advocate, as well as the president of the supreme court and chief of the Romanian Judiciary Inspection who according to article 44 from the Romanian Law 303/2004 and article 99 from Romanian Law 303/2004 were obligated to initiate disciplinary action against judges and prosecutors who break the law, and who of course didn't, and the list goes on as indicated in chapter V.3 from annex 23 from Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures. The previous General Prosecutors of Romania, Tiberiu Nitu who abused office until 2 February 2016, and interim Dimitrie Bogdan Licu, are also aware of the evident collapse of the Romanian judiciary system, being caught and inculpated for it in penal dossiers by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti

The other actors in taking the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 concur to the Romanian Government and Romanian Ombudsman's lie,

* such as the presidents of the two chambers of the Romanian Parliament, by not communicating their plead as proven by paragraph 15 from The Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017

* such as so-called judge Badiu Mandica from the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" who lies as proven by paragraph 7 from The Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 that a so-called medical penal measure of security has nothing to do with the presumption of innocence, in other words the so-called judge Badiu Mandica lying as demonstrated in the paragraphs above that a deed is not legally obligatory to be proven to exist in court, and proven to constitute a felony, and proven that the accused committed it which makes then the accused convicted (after the accused does not appeal, or after the appeal is rejected), unless the evidence is insuficient case in which the trial obligatorily results in an acquittal, or the evidence proves the innocence of the accused, making it juridically and logically aberrant to sentence afterwards an innocent person to be chemically lobotomize all the more it is an infringement of the right to life, physical and psychic integrity, for a crime that is not even proven to exist in the first place which is invalidating even the quality of suspect let alone that of accused, and, the so-called judge Badiu Mandica is in other words lying that an indictment in which the evidence is inventoried, administered and objectivized simultaneously for the accused's guilt and innocence is not legally obligatory to be written by the prosecution and sent in court for judgement because a conviction is necessary prior to a sentence for the emmittal of a so-called medical penal measure of security according to article 331 from the Penal Procedure Code of Romania, and, the so-called judge Badiu Mandica is in other words lying that a deed which obligatorily must be proven in court to exist, constitute a felony, that the accused committed it beyong all reasonable doubt, does not constitute a particular factual premise corelated with an universal law premise from which a sentence for a so-called medical penal measure of security can be inferred, and therefore a deed is not legally obligatory to constitute according to the same juridical logic the valid syllogistic inference to a so-called diagnosis which is a condition for a so-called medical penal measure of security sentence to exist also, in short the so-called judge Badiu Mandica lying that anyone can be locked up in one of the Romanian "psychiatric" charlatanry gulags and be chemically lobotomized meaning Tortured, Bodily Harmed and Qualifiedly Murdered either immediately or delayed (causing a delayed person's death by poisoning is also Qualified Murder) because as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, in Romania being sufficient to be locked up in a "psychiatric" charlatanry gulag to automatically become subject to chemical lobotomization without a diagnosis, under the false logic that anyone who becomes a "psychiatric" charlatanry gulag inmate is there for a reason and that reason is legal even if it doesn't exist at all. Furthermore the so-called judge Badiu Mandica is aberrating that Crimes against humanity - which is the so-called "psychiatric" charlatanry treatment through chemical lobotomization using fluorine and chlorine desguised under the innocent denomination of so-called medical penal measures of security in Romania, aren't a penal sanction, proposition which is technically true since Crimes against humanity aren't penal sanctions but the gravest of crimes, except in reality the so-called judge Badiu Mandica having to obey the law and not the policy of the Romanian "state" organized crime is is being wrong thus aberrating, or ironically in "psychiatric" charlatanry terms, hallucinating or delirating, constituting proof of failure to recognize what's real, the principal symptom of schizophrenia according to DSM-V "psychiatric" charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics. The motive behind this particularized lie is in actuality a chorused rhetoric of the executing members of the Romanian "state" organized crime who simultaneously with the 8 Crimes against humanity attempts and committals against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti since 2014 to the present started uttering that it's for Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti's good that he is subjected to Crimes against humanity, making evident the existence of a central instigator entity who concerted the 8 Crimes against humanity, and who also instigated this side note as a nuance of cover-up to which the executing members of the Romanian "state" organized crime did not know how to naturally react and adapt but just uttered the stringent non-sense as is, as it wasn't their idea to commit state terrorism and political repression abusing the "psychiatric" charlatanry to discredit Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti human rights defender activity and eliminate him simultaneously, as corroborated with the reason behind the fact Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti annulled 4 "psychiatric" charlatanry so-called medical penal measures of security against him, that not all the members of the Romanian "state" organized crime were disposed to get involved in Crimes against humanity, again as objectivized in Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures

* so-called judge Badiu Mandica from courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" also lies according to paragraph 8 from The Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 that, as objectively translated by google translate: "the civil court will be notified of the involuntary admission of the person concerned", which is a multiple fallacy:

** first, the Romanian "state" organized crime never intended to involuntarily incarcerate Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti in a "psychiatric" charlatanry gulag, but chemically lobotomize him as proven by both instances of Crimes against humanity committals, clandestinely in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, and illegally between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, as proven in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.A.II.1.3.1^7 from Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier. As objectivized above incarceration in a Romanian "psychiatric" charlatanry prison-camp means anyway chemical lobotomization as a result of a nation-wide illegal human experimentation racket (crime) the Romanian "state" organized crime is running, certified officially by the Romanian "secret services" SRI who wrote a report to the General Prosecutor of Romania or Romanian Public Ministry about it to disculpate themselves of the responsibility, after which the Romanian Public Ministry run by the General Prosecutor of Romania covered-up the case and did nothing, the illegal human experimentation goes on in the present, and the mafia profits from the chemical lobotomization of institutionalized children constituting Crimes against humanity as demonstrated section I.A.II.1.2^1.2.2 and others from Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier

** second, penal derived dossier 14277/231/2015 (where in 1st instance same so-called judge Badiu Mandica participated) has nothing to do with involuntary "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration, but with obligatory "psychiatric" charlatanry chemical lobotomization as proven by annex 5 of Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, and the so-called judge Badiu Mandica is trying to hide this

** third, there is no such thing as civil obligatory "psychiatric" charlatanry chemical lobotomization or civil obligatory "psychiatric" charlatanry so-called medical treatment, as certified by the Public Ministry declaration in paragraph 4 from Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, as I quote as objectively translated by google translate: "Provisional treatment is a safety measure of a medical nature that can only be taken during the criminal proceedings", evidently because penal security measures or crime prevention is a penal matter, not a civil matter. As proof however of the obsessive murderous intent behind this lie reflecting also the murderous intent behind the falsification of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 for the purpose of cover-up and pretext to commit Crimes against humanity, the Romanian "state" mafia also attempted the 3rd Crimes against humanity against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti through a civil action of "psychiatric" charlatanry placement under interdiction (and failed), civil action which although legally doesn't imply "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration and chemical lobotomization, it was the Romanian "state" organized crime intent to an effect anyway as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^3 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, as the Romanian "state" organized crime doesn't care about the actual law but only counterfeits the appearance of legality, leveraging on the ignorance of the population in legal matters as there's no such thing as legal education in Romania besides superior studies, and even so all law practitioners in Romania are mafia associates or collaborationists at least such as the so-called Romanian lawyers or registrars who can not profess in the mafia controlled judiciary system otherwise as short proof, or mafia capo regimes, underbosses and bosses such as any of the so-called Romanian judges and prosecutors, as statistically proven by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti corroborated with the fact in an anthropic (man-made) medium, this state of fact is the intent not a random event obviosly, and represents in fact the entire Romanian judicial system history, meaning it was always 100% corrupt in favor of the ruling class

The significance of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 is that the entire Romanian "state" or the leaders of the ruling elite(which is no theory, the elite always existed) meaning of the 3 so-called separate powers in the obviously fake Romanian democracy or Romanian totalitarian regime (where a minority meaning the elite usurps the rights of the majority meaning the proletariat) are in cahoots for breaking the law and human rights as proven above for illicit profit, meaning the prime-minister administration or the Romanian Government, the presidents of the two chambers of the Romanian Parliament, and the leaders of the judiciary system as proven not just by the members of the Constitutional Court of Romania blatantly breaking the law and human rights, but also the minister of justice, the president of the supreme court and the chief of the Romanian Judiciary Inspection, all obligated to initiate disciplinary action against the members of the Constitutional Court of Romania for breaking the law, according to article 44 from Romanian Law 317/2004 and article 99 from Romanian Law 303/2004, who of course didn't being part of the same organized crime group which is in control of all the functions of the Romanian "state". Since Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti human rights defending consists of denouncing the omnipresent institutional corruption from bottom up, it is clearly the reason the Romanian "state" mafia perpetrated 2 Crimes against humanity committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts to stop Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti denouncing its criminal activity in a classic totalitarian display of state terrorism and political repression

Because of the significance of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, and because its of scientific principle that observes what occurred once is guaranteed to occur again, meaning law and human rights breaking, especially in an anthropic (man-made) medium where there is no randomness involved but intent, it is worthy of noting who the Constitutional Court of Romania members are: Valer Dorneanu, , Petre Lazaroiu, Mircea Stefan Minea, Daniel Morar, Mona Pivniceru, Livia Doina Stanciu, Simona-Maya Teodoroiu, Varga Attila and Afrodita Laura Tutunaru, because where this persons appear the Romanian "state" organized crime activity exists. Furthermore the extent in time of the Romanian "state" organized crime activity is easily traced back according to paragraph 13 from the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, to the Decision no 16 from 20 January 2005 because it's claimed identical semantically with Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 which is proven falsified, although the history of the Romanian "state" organized crime is beyond the scope of this article which regards rather the present and predictible future under the Romanian "state" organized crime, which is continuous criminal until all these criminals are convicted which is the only way of proving the Romanian has changed to a state of right, which evidently won't happend because the Romanian "state" mafia won't convict itself, the Romanian people are ignorant, selfish, cowardly, treacherous and then divided, and the foreign factors are profiting being in illicit business with the Romanian "state" mafia, therefore being no intent of ever being a Romanian state of right, there won't be one

The consequence of the illegal and unconstitutional Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 logic as proven above, is that it does not regard just the so-called medical penal measures of security, but all security measures because it contradicts the presumption of innocence principle which is the practice of the Romanian "state" mafia controlled so-called judiciary system as proven notoriously by the many trials lost by Romania at ECHR precisely for infringing on the presumption of innocence, practice which reveals the totalitarian policy of the Romanian "state" organized crime of incarcerating and chemically lobotomizing any innocent for illicit profit and control of power to perpetuate the ability to illicitly profit by sacrificing innocent lives, enacted through state terrorism and political repression as instruments of achieving authority by fear, as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti demonstrated logically and scientifically in Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures by leveraging the press and institutional evidence further exposing the fact that the Romanian "state" organized crime profits by chemically lobotomizing and performing illegal human experiments on institutionalized children, members of Rroma minority and other defenseless persons nation-wide, or eliminates undesirables such as dissidents and human rights defenders, through forceful poisoning with deadly neurotoxic fluorine and chlorine based drugs pushed by the pharmaceutical mafia. The Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 represents thus the Romanian "state" organized crime's intent to consecrate publicly its totalitarian regime and authority through state terrorism and political repression, or in other words authority by fear, immediately following the exposure by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti of the national-wide Romanian practice of forcefully chemically lobotomizing innocents though the abuse of the judiciary system which constitute Crimes against humanity for which cover-up the Romanian "state" organized crime emitted a joint Romanian Ministry of justice and Romanian Superior Magistrate Council order that all the illegal judiciary sentences to chemical lobotomization of innocents, disguised under the umbrella terms of "provisory obligation to medical treatment" and other such approximate denominations under which covertly the Romanian "state" organized crime abuses the "psychiatry" charlatanry either for profit through illegal human experimentation, or as state terrorism and political repression against dissidents and human rights defenders, are to be hidden in the Romanian public evidence of dossiers ECRIS, with the exception of those falsified against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti who the Romanian "state" organized crime deemed they would slander and discredit Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti to the public which the Romanian "state" organized crime feared would be outraged, as the so-called judge Craciun Constantin in falsifying the 4th Crimes against humanity attempt in the form of the sentence in penal derived dossier 11224/231/2015, aberrated that Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti must be "psychiatrically" incarcerated so that others don't take his example, which is an actual admittal of the Romania "state" organized crime motive for the Crimes against humanity particularly perpetrated against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti

The pleonastic mention "so-called medical penal measure" is used on purpose to mark the fact by definition there can be no penal or punitive medical measures, because medicine is a discipline sworn to at least do no harm according to the Oath of Hippocrates which in Romania is part of the law, while incarceration and degradation of physical and psychical integrity is against the law according to article 22 from the Romanian Constitution, and according to articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution regarding that the international treaties that Romania ratified are internal right, respectively articles 2 and 3 from ECHR and articles 3 and 5 from UDHR regarding the right to life and prohibition of Torture and Bodily Harm. As demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier regarding a criminal investigation of the "psychiatric" charlatanry itself, it's demonstrated that the "psychiatric" charlatanry never cured anyone of anything using it's so-called medicines consisting of the deadly neurotoxic substances mercury, opium, heroine, fluorine and chlorine as proven by the fact there isn't even one valid proof that it did ever cured anyone, as there can be no proof as all proofs exist to the contrary - that it didn't and couldn't have possibly cured anyone by destroying the nervous system and the rest of the body for that matter, nor is the "psychiatric" charlatanry a science and again inherently can not be medicine, for both reasons that it doesn't adhere to the scientific method and because it contradicts the medical oath of Hippocrates to at least do no harm while only doing harm and counterfeiting evidence it does not such as using false declarations since it cannot actually counterfeit reality, and furthermore is illogical or inconsistent which is one of the principal proofs it's not science but quackery, giving as example the "psychiatric" charlatanry deadly neurotoxic poison paliperidone which is claimed by the commercializer (who has been convicted repeatedly for putting on the market poisons as medicine) that it cures schizophrenia by causing schizophrenia, as objectivized in annex 21 of Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures

The criminal purpose of the Constitutional Court of Romania members, Romanian Government members, People's Advocate and other judicial system members breaking all law and juridical logic as proven, is to create a document that acts both as a cover-up and pretext to perpetrate the 2 Crimes against humanity committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts against human rights defender Tudor-Andrei Raneti, which are objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^1-8 from Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier, unfolding of events which resulted in Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti becoming a political refugee from 1st September 2017 registered with UNHCR according to the Refugee Convention from 1951 and 1976 protocol, fleeing in fear of indefinite to life incarceration, incidental Torture and Bodily Harm to the Romanian "state" mafia's main purpose of committing Qualified Murder to stop Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti's denunciation of its criminal activity, such as Crimes against humanity through chemical lobotomization and illegal human experimentation at a national level on institutionalized children, members of Rroma minority and other disfavored sections as any person in general unable to defend itself and not defended by anyone else, as well as persons put outside the protection of the law by the murderous Romanian "state "mafia regime such as dissidents and human rights defenders, where the law in Romania as made evident by this demonstration of the falsification of the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 is the direct totalitarian manifestation of will of the Romanian "state" organized crime. This not only fits the pattern of classic state terrorism and political repression, but there is no other possible explanation as clearly the Constitutional Court of Romania members have no interest to cover-up and instigate that Crimes against humanity be committed against anyone and be put in jail for it, unless they were assured there would be no negative consequence against them which still doesn't compell them to emmit an illegal decision making them accomplice and implicit instigators to Crimes against humanity past and future, unless not emitting such an obvious and general infringement of the presumption of innocence would lead to repercussions against them perpetrated by the Romanian "state" mafia, motivation which is proven by default because The Constitutional Court of Romania members, the Romanian Government members, the Romanian People's Advocate and the other responsibles for the falsification of the Consitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 were not even accused by the penal authorities let alone convicted or disciplinarily expelled from the body of public functionaries at least as legally obligatory, reiterating in corroboration the fact that these actors having no personal interest in breaking the law for no possible reason leaves the only possible reality that they conveyed the illicit interest of the larger organized crime group they are part of and on which behalf they broke the law, mafia which holds authority over them meaning of which these actors and mafia members are afraid of. This reality is notoriously known and received as a result a variety of nicknames, such as the parallel state", the system, the prosecutor's republic and so on and so forth. The proof that this general decision is evidently directed primarily at Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, is that the exception of unconstitutionality was raised by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, so the law was broken against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, making no logical sense to assume anyone has an interest to destroy a central principle to the rule of law openly, nor against anyone else as nobody before or after acted as a human rights defender and was gravely abused against in the same manner as Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, corroborated with he fact that the 8 Crimes against humanity attempted or committed against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti have the same theme of clandestinely or covertly abusing the "psychiatry" charlatanry - see section I.A.II.1.3.1^2 of Raneti vs Romania at ICC penal dossier especially, and the judiciary system, as weapons of state terrorism and political repression against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, which are proven such according to logic and evidence presented in the Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures that not all the Romanian "state" organized crime members were disposed to be involved in Crimes against humanity, at least not openly until the emittal of the Constitutional Court of Romania Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 which marks the Stalinist paranoid rallying of the Romanian "state" organized crime to silence for all time Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti, as proven by the events during Orthodox Easter 2017 followed by the 7th Crimes against humanity committal, followed by the Romanian organized crime's final solution - the continuous 8th Crimes against humanity attempt as proven by annex 18, annex 19, annex 20 and annex 21 of Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, argument which is corroborated with the obvious fact it also makes no sense for the Romanian "state" organized crime to publicly concoct a cover-up and pretext for Crimes against humanity when it already was committing Crimes against humanity as a result of its internal policy, in other words the Romanian "state" organized crime has no interest of exposing its criminal policy, therefore the falsification of the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 is a result of Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti human rights defending activity, the Romanian "state" organized crime members involved being confronted with a situation without exit - they would not admit the acts of state terrorism and political repression against Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti which would result in loss of authority achieved by fear all the more the Romanian "state" organized crime's defeat would appear at the hand of a single person, and emitting a decision lacking any motivation is obviously illegal as opposed to a falsified one using false arguments, which is why the Romanian "state" mafia chose to falsify the Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, also leveraging on public ignorance and indiference as trained to obey authority without questioning under 45 years of so-called communism, meaning the 1945-1989 Romanian political period. It is worthy of mention as further reference that Romanian organized crime agents posing as ECHR's registrar illegally destroyed Raneti vs Romania at ECHR Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures 6 times for different reasons although being the same petition as further short proof of illegality as objectivized in this penal dossier against them lodged with the General Prosecutor of France, then after the 7th time or the 4th lodging of this petition, ECHR again changed strategy attempting to downplay the Romanian Crimes Against Humanity which it has been covering up since Spring 2017, from the gravest infringement of the right to life to the least grave infringement of the right to private life, which not only did not succeed as objectivized in Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti's response, but the Romanian "state" organized crime refused to answer to it until the 8th January 2019 deadline, asked for the ECHR trial to be delayed until 11th of February 2019, then refused to answer again indefinitely, because it's impossible to justify committing Crimes against humanity - being note worthy the tone of the Romanian Ministry of Exterior that is assessing "the real situation" as if any of the Romanian citizens who have ever petitioned ECHR have a possible reason to lie about the Romanian "state" organized crime infringing on human rights, all the way through the Romanian collapsed judiciary system to ECHR, and face condemnation for the felony of giving False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies into error, in short the Romanian Ministry of Exterior being indoctrinated with the generalized Romanian "state" organized crime policy of declaring its victims "guilty until innocent", which in reality is the Romanian "state" mafia's modus operandi and clear intent of repressing its victims from achieving justice

Above the scientific and logical evidence used to demonstrate this reality beyond all reasonable doubt, stands in corroboration that all actors involved tacitly admit the veracity of Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti investigative work and conclusions by not even accusing him of the felony of False declarations (see Penal Code of Romania article 326) to the Romanian Government, Parliament and the various judiciary institutions, as well as to European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, the various United Nations bodies and committees, INTERPOL, France's general prosecutor's office and other institutions and organizations notified by Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti withheld from being named for security reasons, and for brevity, nor did any institution or organization ever accuse even Mr Tudor-Andrei Raneti of the felony of Disseminating false information (see Penal Code of Romania article 404) for publishing his investigation results demonstrating the Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity on the internet in the form of the penal dossiers concomitantly lodged with the penal authorities, and spreading this truth through internet media, which constitutes proof of verity according to the juridical logic principle of excluded third or law of the excluded middle

Back to index

#banned_by_facebook #banned_by_wikipedia #because_us_dissinformation